Category: Uncategorized

  • THE IMPERIALIST SELF-JUSTIFICATIONS

    If, as it seems, the president of the United States takes orders from Israel, this makes Israel today’s arch-imperialist power, which is strange insofar as Israel apparently, alone, among history’s successive hegemonic powers, is uniquely lacking in an ideological justification with something approaching plausibility for external, and not just internal, consumption. To be God’s chosen people can surely be flattering and praiseworthy only to those who can see themselves as included in this category. Does this mean that such an imperialist power can rely only on blackmail to maintain its position?

    The first of the European powers to seek hegemony over the New World was Portugal, whose supremacy was quickly challenged, with the assistance of the Dutch, by Spain.

    Here is a timeline, presented by Robin Blackburn in his book “The Making of New World Slavery” (p.9)

    “The theory of empire which the Portuguese, Spanish, French, Dutch and English came to expound appealed to God-given rights, but with interesting differences of emphasis. The Portuguese emphasized their rights as “discoverers”, not so much of the land as of the sea-routes between Europe and the newly discovered coast; Portuguese captains were required to register navigational details of their discoveries as well as marking them with a stone cross. The Spanish monarch claimed to rule the Americas by a God-given right of conquest , so long as the ceremony of the ‘Requirement’ demanding peaceful submission had been observed. Supposedly the Aztec and Inca rulers, having failed to respond and having obstructed the Spaniards’ free movements, had been conquered in a ‘just war’. The French believed the Spanish ‘Requirement’ and conquest were a mockery of Christian behavior and violated the God-given natural rights of the indigenous peoples. The French, therefore, appeared in the New World as friends and allies of the natives, and supposedly established colonies only with their unforced consent. The Dutch asserted their right not simply as navigators but principally as traders; in contrast to the Iberian powers they believed that there was a God-given natural right of all to sail the high seas in pursuit of trade, and to the better life that commerce brought with it. Finally, the English laid stress on the fact that their colonists, as cultivators or “planters”, were making better use of the land than native hunters-and-gatherers or colonial rivals, and thus enjoyed Divine sanction.

    This bare summary simply picks out the most salient feature in each imperialist ideology; in practice the various powers constantly sought to imitate one another’s successes and learn from their mistakes. But their competitive success naturally depends upon the resources and institutions each could dispose of. While the Spanish approach, at one extreme, was highly dependent on state initiative and control, the English formula, at the other, critically depended upon the initiative and competence of the colonists themselves, albeit within the terms of some royal charter or bequest. “

    Fast forward to today’s would-be appropriation of “the global South” by a coalition headed by Russia and China, the formerly Communist allies and rivals. Is it a new characteristic of this latest effort for the imposition of global hegemony that it no longer seeks to implant its own language but most probably contents itself with taking over the language and culture of its predecessor, as Rome largely did before it? One question among the many.

    Postscript

    This is a message from Yanis Varoufakis, economist, former finance minister of Greece, author of numerous bestselling books and contributor to the Australia Institute Press’s latest book, A Time for Bravery: What happens when Australia chooses courage?

    Hear from me firsthand in conversation with Australia Institute Deputy Director Ebony Bennett on Zoom, Wednesday 4 March, 11 AM AEDT.

    Comment from W.H.

    I participated in this online discussion, posting two questions to Yanis in the chat.

    1. What is your attitude to the proposal of Professor Ian Brighthope for secession of Western Australia? https://cairnsnews.org/2026/02/27/labor-government-treats-states-like-cash-cows-milking-resources-starving-their-potential-time-to-secede/

    2. Do you feel that it would be good for you and Liz Gunn to collaborate? (Is Yanis even aware of the existence of LIz Gunn?) Neither of these questions were noticed, much less answered. Yanis did however manage to include a comment on the value of “vaccinations” as public health measures.

  • Γλωσσική πολιτική

    Η πλημμύρα μεταναστών από παντού που εισρέει επί του παρόντος στην Αυστραλία, σε μια αδιαμφισβήτητη προσπάθεια να αλλάξει ο δημογραφικός χαρακτήρας του πληθυσμού, φαίνεται να προορίζεται να μετατρέψει την Αυστραλία σε μια κακή (ακόμη χειρότερη) αντιγραφή της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης. Ποιος δεν έχει δει τη φωτογραφία (μια φωτογραφία;) των πλήθων στο Μελβούρνη έξω από το σταθμό Flinders Street, όπου δεν υπάρχει σχεδόν κανένα «λευκό» πρόσωπο. Αλλά αυτή η κατάσταση μπορεί να ανατραπεί, ειδικά αν λάβουμε υπόψη την επιτυχία του Ισραήλ να καθιερώσει τα εβραϊκά ως γλώσσα του κράτους, σε έντονη αντίθεση με την αποτυχία της Ιρλανδίας να καθιερώσει την ιρλανδική γλώσσα ως lingua franca της χώρας.

    Η προσπάθεια να μετατραπεί η Ουκρανία σε «το νέο μεγαλύτερο Ισραήλ» έχει προφανώς αποτύχει. Ίσως είναι καιρός να πάρουμε μερικές ιδέες από έναν από τους επιτυχημένους τομείς της αποικιοποίησης της Παλαιστίνης: την ισραηλινή γλωσσική πολιτική. Τα εβραϊκά έχουν εισαχθεί με επιτυχία ως η κύρια γλώσσα του ισραηλινού κράτους, αντικαθιστώντας τα Yiddish ς και αντικαθιστώντας ή τουλάχιστον επισκιάζοντας τις εθνικές γλώσσες των πολλών χωρών από τις οποίες έχουν έρθει εβραίοι μετανάστες στο Ισραήλ.

    Στην Αυστραλία, η «πολιτική της λευκής Αυστραλίας», που επιβίωσε μέχρι τα μέσα του εικοστού αιώνα, έχει αντικατασταθεί σε επίσημο επίπεδο από μια σχεδόν θρησκευτική εξιδανίκευση των «πρώτων λαών» της Αυστραλίας. Αυτό αναμένεται να μετριαστεί, αλλά κατά τη γνώμη μου είναι απίθανο να «επιστρέψει» σε οτιδήποτε αναγνωρίσιμο από το παρελθόν.

    Ως Αυστραλός γεννημένος στη Νέα Νότια Ουαλία, αλλά έχοντας ζήσει στη δεκαετία του 1970 για τέσσερα χρόνια στη Μελβούρνη και έχοντας κάποια μικρή επαφή με τις συνδικαλιστικές δραστηριότητες, παρατήρησα ότι οι Αυστραλοί «πρώτοι λαοί» και άλλοι που ταυτίζονταν μαζί τους ήταν πολύ πιο φιλικοί προς τους μεσογειακούς μετανάστες (κυρίως Έλληνες) από ό,τι προς τους Αυστραλούς αγγλο-κελτικής καταγωγής.

    Δείτε αυτή την καταχώριση από τον ιστότοπο του νεαρού Ελληνοαυστραλού Κανέλλου Πατσίου: https://main.cse-initiative.eu/?p=1313 

    Ο Κανέλλος πρόσφατα πήρε συνέντευξη από τον πρώην Έλληνα υπουργό Οικονομικών Γιάννη Βαρουφάκη, ο οποίος έζησε για δώδεκα χρόνια στην Αυστραλία, έχει μια δεύτερη οικογένεια στην Αυστραλία και θεωρεί την Αυστραλία ως τη δεύτερη πατρίδα του. Θα ενδιαφερόταν ο Βαρουφάκης (και φυσικά και ο Κανέλλος ) να προσπαθήσει να κάνει την ελληνική γλώσσα «τα εβραϊκά της Αυστραλίας»; Ο Καναδάς είναι ένα δίγλωσσο κράτος με την αγγλική γλώσσα να κατέχει ακόμα την πρώτη θέση. Αλλά η αγγλική γλώσσα είναι πολύ πιο κατάλληλη για να γίνει η «εσπεράντο» των νικητών», παρά για να γίνει η γλώσσα κάποιου κράτους. Στον σημερινό κόσμο, οι αγγλόφωνοι που δεν γνωρίζουν καμία άλλη γλώσσα βρίσκονται σε σαφή και επιδεινούμενη μειονεκτική θέση. 

  • Dialogue with Australian writer Shelley Dark

    6th February 2026

    W.H. I have just been given your book “Son of Hydra” by my friend Vice-Admiral Heraklis Kalogerakis.

    Shelley Dark: How lovely – please thank Vice-Admiral Kalogerakis for me. I hope you enjoy it.

    W.H. I am starting it now. We are just over the road from the Voulgaris estate.

    S.D. Wayne, do you know anything of the history of the Voulgaris estate? Or maybe an online reference? I would love to know more.

    W.H. https://www.karapanou.com/the-story/#the-history-of-oikia

    S.D. Thank you so much, Wayne. That is interesting, Wayne. Do you know when it was acquired? I didn’t include any mention of Aegina in “Son of Hydra” because I wasn’t sure when the land was acquired – whether the Sultan granted it to Giorgos along with the title of Bey and governor of Hydra or whether he bought it before he became governor, during his time in office or later, after leaving Hydra, under pressure from the Council.

    But Ghikas would certainly have known about it.

    W.H.  I am not  well informed about all this. You can ask Heraklis the relevant questions. But here is something I sent to Heraklis the day before yesterday and mentioned to him last night when we were together in a restaurant:

    https://main.cse-initiative.eu/?p=1349

    There is much more to come out of this serendipity.

    Shelley are you related to Eleanor Dark?

    From Shelley Dark’s “Son of Hydra”, p. 382

    “I have news of Greece,” says Ando. “From the newspapers. Would you like to hear?”

    “You know I would!” I lift my voice.

    “You know the new Greek king is a Bavarian – a Roman Catholic? His taxes are higher than the Sultan’s and the foreign debts remain. It’s a disaster – no constitution, no democracy. They sentenced our Hydriot war heroes to death and only pardoned them under pressure.’

    Damos says, ‘Didn’t you hear that Ghikas’ friend, Spryidon Trikoupis, is petitioning the English king to pardon men who fought in the revolution?”

    Bitterness heats my face. (thinks Ghikas)  ‘He had a chance to do something when we were in Malta. He’s forgotten we exist.’

    Ando continues.  ‘Well, they shifted the government to Athens, still in rubble. And they speak French instead of Greek. They wear western dress.

    I struggle to picture this.

    ‘Hydra is in a worse position than before the war.’

    I place my mug on the table. ‘So, Ando, are you still Greek?’

    ‘Even if I were to be given a pardon, Ghika, I will stay in New South Wales. I sell my first crop of wheat this year. One day I will buy my own land.’

  • Hugo Lennon

    “Here, courtesy of my Byron Bay friend Jan, what the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (in my youth called the Australian Broadcasting Commission) has to say about Hugo Lennon.”

    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-08-28/who-is-behind-march-for-australia-anti-immigration-rallies/105657548?utm_source=abc_news_web&utm_medium=content_shared&utm_campaign=abc_news_web

    Postscript on the idea that “far left” and “far right” are “all the same”

    The story of Queensland medical doctor the late John McCarthy refutes this idea.

    It is true that John’s political views – which were more or less shared in the 1970s, albeit off the record, even by such people as former governor-general Bill Hayden, have not stood the test of time. The collapse of the Soviet Union could not be intellectually integrated by the then probably most influential Trotskyist  theoretician, the Belgian economist Ernest Mandel. Specifically  Mandel’s belief that the Soviet nuclear arsenal provided “a measure of protection” to the Soviet state as such appears illusory. But John McCarthy’s devotion to justice and in particular to what are now known as “first nation Australians” was unquestionable. His companion of that time, the later well-known Marcia Langton, would not dispute that, in my opinion. If she and John had remained together she herself might not have become a celebrity but  on the other hand John also may not have departed this world at the relatively young age of sixty.

    https://halva.proboards.com/thread/221/john-mccarthy-1948-2008