Ioannis Capodistrias, guardian angel of independence of the Vaud

All Vaudois know the doctor César Roux, the American president Woodrow Wilson, the baron Pierre de Coubertin, or even Maurice Béjart. By contrast, Ioannis Capodistrias is completely unknown. Nevertheless, like the others, the one-time Russian envoy in Switzerland is one of the sixteen honorary citizens of the city of Lausanne. In fact he was the first to attain this title, in 1816.

RAPHAËL EBINGER | 19.09.2009 | 00:00

Micheline Calmy-Rey και Sergej Lavrov
The first honorary citizen of Lausanne

From Monday [21 Sept 2009] onwards Ioannis Capodistrias will be stirring the memories of the Vaudois and the Lausannois in the aftermath of the inauguration of a bust at Ouchy (see below). This work will have the advantage of shedding light on the role he played at the highest level during the critical historical turning point at the beginning of the 19th century when the Swiss Federation was breaking away from the French Empire, with all the dislocations that involved. Apart from participating in maintenance of the cohesion of the country, this bridge-builder and pacifier born at Corfu in 1776 was also the guardian angel of the canton of Vaud. He succeeded in defending its independence at the demand of Czar Alexander I, who was himself very attached to the canton since his encounter with his preceptor (from Rolle in the Vaud) Frédéric-César de La Harpe.

“You want the Aargau? You’re not going to have it! You want the canton of Vaud? You’re not going to have it! And if it comes to that, we may very well exclude you from the Confederation!” The opposition of Count Ioannis Capodistrias to the Bernese campaign for restoration of the old bailiwick system after the Act of Mediation gained him immense recognition in the canton of Vaud, which offered him naturalization at the same moment as Lausanne was for the first time awarding honorary citizenship. These gestures were immensely moving to their recipient: “The sincere affection and esteem that your nation inspires in me long precede, if I may say so, the formal association that is so agreeable to me to contract today.” he wrote on 9th June in a letter of thanks to the Municipality of Lausanne.

Commissioned by the Czar to see to it that Switzerland should be emancipated from French influence, Ioannis Capodistrias was brought face to face with a conglomerate of petty republics, at odds on the future of the Confederation, some of them desiring a return to the 13-canton regime that had preceded the Revolution, others wishing to defend the gains of the 19-canton confederation sought by the Act of Mediation. A subtle mediator, he rapidly succeeded in imposing himself in this difficult context as a personality indispensable to the political world of Switzerland. His influence was such that all the cantonal constitutions then under elaboration were subordinated to it. He also attentively supervised the drawing-up of the first federal Constitution adopted on the 7th August 1815, with the new federal pact guaranteeing the independence of the state of Vaud.

What remained was to consolidate the country’s independence at the international level. He succeeded in doing this between 1814 and 1815 at the Congress of Vienna, during which the victors over Napoleon redrew Europe’s frontiers. Working from inside the Russian delegation, he obtained recognition for our country and for Swiss neutrality. “What he achieved was a masterpiece of disinterested persuasion” was the contemporary testimony of Pictet de Richemond, representative of Geneva at the Congress. “Among most ministers of state, the heart is sterile terrain, and it is very rare for men endowed with such genius as he to accord it much place in their calculations.”

Having performed these good offices in Switzerland, Ioannis Capodistrias returned to Russia, where he was head of foreign affairs. At that time he was even the minister most favoured by the Czar, but that did not save him from being put on leave in 1822 when he began to exert himself to obtain independence for Greece. When Greek independence was won he was even made the country’s first president in 1827. He then undertook a reform of education, taking the ideas of Rousseau as his point of departure. It is also due to him that potato cultivation was introduced to Greece. .

He repelled the danger from Turkey, investing all his fortune in this even to the precious stones from the decorations he had been awarded. But his actions earned him the hatred of the heads of numerous local factions. The sons of one of them put an end to his reign in the most tragic manner. On 9th October 1831 at 6 a.m., on the threshold of the church of Saint Spyridon in Nafplion, he was brought down by two bullets in the forehead and a dagger in the stomach. One of the murderers managed to take flight but the other was lynched by the mob.
“The assassination of Capodistrias is a dark page in our history,” says Dimitris Kiritsis, president of the Estia Hellenic Association of Lausanne. But in Greece he is one of our country’s most celebrated figures. His face is to be seen on 20 cent European coins. The University of Athens, the airport of Corfu, and many other institutions, bear his name.

A bust inaugurated at Ouchy Lausanne will finally have its monument paying homage to its first honorary citizen. On Monday, in the evening, a bronze bust with the signature of the Russian sculptor Vladimir Surovtsev will in fact be unveiled between the Quai Pascal Delamuraz and the Allée des Bacounis at Ouchy. The ceremony is sure to attract a sizeable and distinguished audience to the shores of the lake. The Swiss Minister of Foreign Affairs Micheline Calmy-Rey and her Russian counterpart Sergey Lavrov will be among the participants, as will the mayor of Lausanne Daniel Brélaz and the President of Vaud’s Council of State Pascal Broulis. For this magistrate of Greek origins, freshly returned from Moscow where he led a delegation from Vaud, the event was of particular significance. “For me Ioannis Capodistrias represents European construction in the positive sense,” he says.


Part of a Russian-Greek-Lausannian initiative, the installation of the sculpture was accelerated to make possible its inauguration during the visit to Switzerland of Russian president Dimitri Medvedev, who was nevertheless unable to participate in the ceremony.

SOURCE

Greece–Switzerland relations

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Greek-Swiss relations
Map indicating locations of Greece and Switzerland

Greece

Switzerland

 

Greek-Swiss relations are foreign relations between Greece and Switzerland. Both countries established diplomatic relations in 1830. Switzerland opened its consulate in 1865. Greece has an embassy in Bern, a general consulate in Geneva, and two honorary consulates in Zurich and Lugano. Switzerland has an embassy in Athens and four consulates (Thessaloniki, Corfu, Patras, Rhodos).

Relations

Greece and Switzerland have a long tradition of relations. Before and during the Congress of Vienna in 1815 Ioannis Kapodistrias, a native of Corfu in the service of Tsar Alexander I of Russia, laboured successfully for reorganisation of the Swiss Confederation and for the international recognition of Swiss neutrality.[1] In 1816, he became the first honorary citizen of the city of Lausanne[2] and in 1827 the first Governor of the Hellenic State. Switzerland was one of the nations that supported the creation of the Greek nation in 1830. Two natives of Geneva exercised important functions in the newly constituted Greek monarchy: Jean-Gabriel Eynard as one of the founders of the National Bank of Greece (1842) and Louis-André Gosse was involved in fighting the plague epidemic of 1827 and was a commander in the Greek Navy.[1]

During the Second World War, Switzerland represented the interests of numerous countries in occupied Greece and supported the civilian population. During the military dictatorship (1967-1974) in Greece, many opposition figures found refuge in Switzerland. The Swiss Committee for the Restoration of Democracy in Greece was formed in Bern in 1967.[1]

Greece and Switzerland have a number of treaties between the two countries, mainly dealing with commerce.[3] Some of the major treaties between the countries deal with Social Security and the avoidance of double taxation in respect of income tax.[4]

Trade

The balance of trade between Greece and Switzerland is generally toward Switzerland, with Greece having a constant trade deficit. Between 2006 and 2007 Swiss exports to Greece increased 12.9%, while Greek exports to Switzerland increased 26.4%.[5] The main Swiss products imported into Greece are pharmaceuticals and medical supplies, watches, clocks and other luxury goods, machinery and high technology products, electronic equipment, and specific types of food. The main Greek products imported into Switzerland are food and beverages, chemicals, construction materials, and textiles.[4] There are about 48 Swiss companies in Greece[4] which employ about 10’000 people in Greece.[1] Around 300,000 Swiss vacationers visit Greece every year.[1]

Balance of Trade between Greece and Switzerland (in millions of Swiss Francs)[4]
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2007[5]
Swiss exports to Greece 928.4 852.7 848.7 910.2 948.8 1091.9 1180.7 1306
Greek exports to Switzerland 120.4 126.4 136.1 153.0 134.8 151.9 150.3 316
Balance of Trade -808.0 -726.3 -712.6 -757.2 -814.0 -940.0 -1030.4 -990

Statement by Giulietto Chiesa on the crisis in Ukraine

giulietto_chiesa_talk

(Giulietto Chiesa was a key speaker at the Aegina Society of Active Citizens’ function “Capodistrias and Spinelli today – European Union: Disintegration or a new beginning?”, held in Aegina on 23rd June 2013.)

Function: http://main.cse-initiative.eu/?p=111 //  VIDEO

G. Chiesa’s visit to the Capodistrian buildings of Aegina: VIDEO

Persuading Daniel Cohn-Bendit of the importance of Capodistrias: VIDEO


Statement

The crisis in Ukraine, which clearly affects the international community, is a matter for deep concern, threatening both the sovereignty of Ukraine and the independence of Europe, triggering an unwelcome polarisation of the international system and impacting an always fragile geopolitical balance.

We would like it to be borne in mind that a historical transition from a unipolar world – with the US as the sole superpower – towards a multipolar world is underway and that this process should be aided and abetted rather than contained. The whole world, including Europe and the United States, will gain from a jointly-conducted re-organisation of global governance that recognizes multipolarity.

We believethat Europe is able to contribute positively to the peaceful emergence of a multipolar world. Indeed the Ukrainian crisis has shown that, while an independent and open Europe provides grounds for the emergence of a multipolar world, a one-sided Europe creates the conditions for a world polarized between a Western bloc and the new global powers.

Therefore, we strongly oppose the disruption of Euro-Russian relations, with the deployment of troops on both sides of the Euro-Russian border, and in particular of US military troops on Europe’s territory, with the growing tensions provoked by the uncoordinated free-trade policies of Europe and Russia on common border countries such as Ukraine, Georgia, and Moldova.

We consider that the Ukrainian crisis calls for the establishment of a diplomatic arena to discuss Europe’s and Russia’s rights to organize their common markets in a framework of peaceful coexistence.

We note the humanitarian emergency situation in Ukraine and crimes and abuses committed against the civil populations during the Ukrainian crisis and urge that these should be promptly dealt with and investigated.

We believe that the Euro-BRICS framework of co-operation can provide the proper mediation that is required for a positive outcome to be achieved.

The situation requires global leaders with a high sense of historical responsibility and collective interest.

We believe that responsibilities for the crisis in Ukraine must be shared between Europe and Russia. On the basis of the recognition of each player’s responsibilities it will become possible to rebuild peace in Ukraine and revive Euro-Russian relations.

RESUMING EURO-RUSSIAN RELATIONS TO CREATE THE CONDITIONS FOR A UKRAINIAN-LED CRISIS RESOLUTION

It is up to the Ukrainian people to organize and rebuild peace in Ukraine. However there is no way tensions between the pro-Russian and pro-European Ukrainians will de-escalate if tensions between Russia and Europe do not de-escalate first. Therefore, for the sake of peace in Ukraine, we require European and Russian leaders to re-launch a constructive dialogue, in particular encouraging the media to provide more objective information and correct any misinformation that might lead to future conflict.

Note This draft is almost completely extracted from a joint declaration of academicians, professors, journalists, former political personalities of the BRICS countries. I believe that a dialogue could be built on this basis.

Giulietto Chiesa

N.B. The English text of the EuroBRICS joint declaration on Ukraine is at:

http://www.leap2020.net/euro-brics/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Joint-Statement-Euro-BRICS-June-2014.pdf

Δήλωση του Giulietto Chiesa για την κρίση στην Ουκρανία

giulietto_chiesa_talk

(O Giulietto Chiesa υπήρξε από τους ομιλητές στην ημερίδα του Συλλόγου των Ενεργών Πολιτών Αίγινας «Καποδίστριας-Σπινέλλι  Σήμερα – Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση: Διάλυση ή επανεκκίνηση;», η οποία διεξήχθη στις 23 Ιουνίου 2013 στην Αίγινα)

Ημερίδα: http://aeginalight.gr/article.php?id=23883#.U9eyfMscTIU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wPniHFeXiM

Επίσκεψη του G. Chiesa στα καποδιαστριακά κτήρια της Αίγινας: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmDHoNPfmlM


Δήλωση

H κρίση στην Ουκρανία, η οποία σαφώς έχει επιπτώσεις σε ολόκληρη τη «διεθνή κοινότητα», προκαλεί έντονο προβληματισμό και βαθειά ανησυχία. Απειλεί τόσο την κυριαρχία της Ουκρανίας όσο και την ανεξαρτησία της Ευρώπης, προξενώντας, στα πλαίσια του διεθνούς συστήματος, μια ανεπιθύμητη πόλωση, αναταράσσοντας τις πάντοτε εύθραυστες γεωπολιτικές ισορροπίες.

Θέλουμε να υπενθυμίσουμε ότι έχει ήδη ξεκινήσει μια ιστορική μετάβαση από ένα μονοπολικό κόσμο, επικεντρωμένο στην μοναδική υπερδύναμη, τις Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες, προς σ΄ένα πολυπολικό κόσμο. Το ζητούμενο είναι, αυτή η μετάβαση να υποβοηθηθεί, όχι να περιοριστεί ή να αποτραπεί. Ολόκληρος ο κόσμος, συμπεριλαμβανομένων της Ευρώπης και των ΗΠΑ, θα κερδίσει από την επιτυχία μιας από κοινού επαναδιοργάνωσης της διακυβέρνησης του πλανήτη η οποία αναγνωρίζει την πολυπολικότητα.

Πιστεύουμε ότι η Ευρώπη έχει τη δυνατότητα να συμβάλλει θετικά στην ειρηνική ανάδυση ενός πολυπολικού κόσμου. Η κρίση στην Ουκρανία έχει αποδείξει μάλιστα ότι, ενώ μια ανεξάρτητη και ανοιχτή Ευρώπη δίνει περιθώρια για την ανάδυση της πολυπολικότητας, μια μονόπλευρη Ευρώπη προετοιμάζει το έδαφος για ένα κόσμο διαιρεμένο μεταξύ του δυτικού μπλοκ και των νέων αναδυόμενων δυνάμεων.

Συνεπώς τασσόμαστε ανεπιφύλακτα κατά της αναστάτωσης των ευρωρωσικών σχέσεων, απορρίπτουμε τη στάθμευση στρατευμάτων και στις δύο πλευρές των συνόρων ανάμεσα στην Ευρώπη και τη Ρωσία – και ειδικά αμερικανικών στρατευμάτων στο έδαφος της Ευρώπης – και προειδοποιούμε για την αυξανόμενη ένταση που προκαλούν οι ασυντόνιστες πολιτικές ελευθέρου εμπορίου της Ευρώπης και της Ρωσίας με τις χώρες που συνορεύουν, όπως η Ουκρανία, η Γεωργία, η Μολδαβία.

Πιστεύουμε ότι η κρίση στην Ουκρανία καθιστά επιτακτική τη δημιουργία ενός κοινού διπλωματικού χώρου στον οποίο θα μπορούν να συζητηθούν και να συμφωνηθούν τα δικαιώματα της Ευρώπης και της Ρωσίας να οργανώνουν τις κοινές τους αγορές, πάντα εντός του πλαισίου της ειρηνικής συνύπαρξής τους.

Ανησυχούμε για την κατάσταση έκτακτης ανθρωπιστικής ανάγκης στην Ουκρανία, καταγγέλλουμε τα εγκλήματα και τις καταχρήσεις που διαπράχθηκαν κατά τη διάρκεια της κρίσης ενάντια σε άμαχους πληθυσμούς και προτρέπουμε για την άμεση διερεύνησή τους.

Πιστεύουμε ότι το πλαίσιο συνεργασίας Euro-BRICS είναι σε θέση να παρέχει την απαιτούμενη μεσολάβηση έτσι ώστε να επιτευχθεί μια θετική εκδοχή.

Η κατάσταση έχει ανάγκη από ηγέτες πλανητικού κύρους, με μεγάλη αίσθηση ιστορικής ευθύνης και συλλογικού συμφέροντος.

Προτείνουμε τον καταμερισμό των ευθυνών για την Ουκρανία ανάμεσα στην Ευρώπη και τη Ρωσία. Πάνω στη βάση της αναγνώρισης των ευθυνών του κάθε εμπλεκόμενου θα είναι εφικτή η εδραίωση της ειρήνης στην Ουκρανία και η αναζωογόνηση των ευρω-ρωσικών σχέσεων.

ΕΠΑΝΑΣΎΣΤΑΣΗ ΤΩΝ ΕΥΡΩ-ΡΩΣΙΚΏΝ ΣΧΕΣΕΩΝ ΠΡΟΚΕΙΜΕΝΟΥ ΝΑ ΔΗΜΙΟΥΡΓΗΘΟΎΝ ΟΙ ΠΡΟΥΠΟΘΕΣΕΙΣ ΓΙΑ ΟΥΚΡΑΝΟ-ΟΔΗΓΟΎΜΕΝΗ ΕΠΙΛΎΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΚΡΊΣΗΣ

Εναπόκειται στον λαό της Ουκρανίας να οργανώσει και να εδραιώσει την ειρήνη στην Ουκρανία. Όμως δεν υπάρχει τρόπος να αποκλιμακωθεί η ένταση ανάμεσα στους φιλορωσικούς και φιλοευρωπαϊκούς Ουκρανούς αν δεν εξασφαλισθεί πρώτα η αποκλιμάκωση της έντασης ανάμεσα στη Ρωσία και την Ευρώπη. Συνεπώς, για χάρη της ειρήνης στην Ουκρανία, απαιτούμε από τους ηγέτες της Ρωσίας και της Ευρώπης την έναρξη εποικοδομητικού διαλόγου, αναμένοντας ιδιαίτερα από τα Μέσα Μαζικής Ενημέρωσης να παρέχουν πιο αντικειμενικές πληροφορίες, εξαλείφοντας την παραπληροφόρηση που μπορεί να οδηγήσει σε μελλοντικές συγκρούσεις.

Σημείωση: το παρόν σχέδιο-κείμενο προέρχεται σχεδόν αποκλειστικά από κοινή δήλωση πανεπιστημιακών, καθηγητών, δημοσιογράφων και πρώην προσωπικοτήτων της πολιτικής στις χώρες BRICS. Πιστεύω ότι θα μπορέσει να ξεκινήσει διάλογος από αυτή τη βάση.

Giulietto Chiesa

BRICS ονομάζεται η πολιτική και οικονομική συνεργασία των ακόλουθων χωρών: Βραζιλία, Ρωσία, Ινδία, Κίνα, Νότιος Αφρική.
Η αγγλική εκδοχή της δήλωσης EuroBRICS για την Ουκρανία βρίσκεται στο  http://www.leap2020.net/euro-brics/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Joint-Statement-Euro-BRICS-June-2014.pdf

Πρωτότυπη δημοσίευση: AEGINA LIGHT